Tuesday, 13 March 2012

The Myths the Myths, the Shetland and Orkney sagas.

Continental shelf: If Westminster retains control of Shetland, Orkney and Rockall, Scotland will have no oil resources.

If Scotland becomes independent Westminster won't be able to hang on to Shetland, Orkney, Rockall or any other part of Scotland (see: Shetland and Orkney).

However, even under the hypothetical circumstance that this occurred, Westminster wouldn't be able to retain control of the oil fields anyway, so ya boo sux. These matters are regulated by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, to which the UK is a signatory. International law specifies that a state controls the continental shelf and associated mineral and fishing rights up to 200 nautical miles (230 miles or 370 km) off its shores. When another state possesses an island within the continental shelf of this state, special rules apply.

The continental shelf off the Atlantic coast is Scotland's to exploit and develop, even if Westminster clung on to Rockall like a plook on the face of an adolescent sociopath. According to the Law of the Sea: "rocks which could not sustain human habitation or economic life of their own would have no economic zone or continental shelf." Westminster could pauchle its way to keeping Rockall, but as far as oil and fishing exploitation rights are concerned, they'd be entitled to rockall.

Neither would Westminster gain much by holding onto Shetland and Orkney. When an island belonging to one state sits on the continental shelf of another state, the islands are treated as enclaves. This matter was discussed in detail in a legal paper published by the European Journal of International Law: Prospective Anglo-Scottish Maritime Boundary Revisited

Most of the rights to the continental shelf would remain Scottish, Map 2 on page 29 of the legal paper shows the most likely sea boundaries. Westminster would be entitled only to a small zone around the islands, and the waters between Orkney and Shetland. This area contains no oil fields. If Shetland and Orkney were to remain under Westminster's control, Shetland would no longer have an oil fund. The map is reproduced here, so you can do a reverse Jeremy Paxman and sneer derisively at Westminster's pretensions.

Westminster's Shetland threat is a bluff. Westminster knows it's a bluff. They just don't want us to know too.

Credit rating: Scotland would lose the AAA credit rating it enjoys as part of the UK.

This scare story is based upon a single article in the Financial Times. It's all based on the unresearched opinion of a single guy in a trading room somewhere in the City of London, that noted hotbed of pro-Scottish independence sentiment. It was a guess, as was reported in the original report in the Financial Times. We could just as legitimately "guess" that Scotland would have a secure AAA rating but what's left of the UK would be downgraded to a ZZZ. Zzzz is the best response to these scare stories.

Credit ratings are based upon the market's assessment of whether creditors are likely to get their dosh back if they lend it to a government. There are many countries of Scotland's size which have a triple A credit rating, most of which are not blessed with Scotland's embarrassing abundance of natural resources, a healthy tourism industry, the whisky trade, an English speaking populace with easy access to European markets, and a budget surplus over the past five or six years - despite the financial crisis.

The recent news that the UK and the Bank of England have been put on a negative outlook by the credit ratings agency Moody's shows that the much prized AAA rating is by no means secure within the UK.


livescore said...

Gorgeous dress and lovely fabric choice! Don't be sad about ผลบอล moving to London, think of all the lovely vintage social events you ผลบอลสด can go to. Also London has great fabric shops!

Anonymous said...

And the Shetland Islanders want independence from Scotland - they should have this right. Of course, that would mess up Scotland's plans for getting all of the oil for itself: so Alex Salmond is shamefully ignoring their wishes for self-determination and refusing to allow for a breakaway Shetland Islands state, instead promising 'greater devolved powers' in return for taking their oil and fishing rights from them. As the old Shetland saying goes

"All the Shetland ever got from Scotland was dear meal and greedy ministers."

Not much has changed in the last couple of hundred years...

Key bored warrior. said...

Better late than never Tavish. However I am intrigued on what evidence you suggest that Shetlanders want Independence from Scotland. Are you big enough to provide it.
Shetland already has cut a deal with the oil companies that is much better than any deal Scotland has. Why you think there "rights" are to be removed from them is a mystery, and of course lies and unionist propaganda.
Why they would wish to divorce from Scotland from which it gets it's life line support is also a mystery. Why they would wish to throw their lot in with London defies common sense and logic.
This is a notion that is born of bitterness spite and malice and visceral hatred of the SNP and Alex Salmond. It does nothing but demonstrate how utterly mired the unionists are in hatred and negativity such that it will see a resounding YES for Scottish Independence and even more unionist resignations as they slink away to nurse their bile.
Yours sincerely KBW

Scot Independent.


Follow this site




Bloggers who can bother with me;)

About Me

Go on click me...

Go on click me...
Pig in the middle as usual.